RPG FORUM
May 22, 2012, 01:08:19 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new forum. Don't forget to check out RPGlife.com, an exciting new social networking site for gamers.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: Do you approve the following amendment to the AUP?  (Voting closed: December 18, 2008, 12:49:45 PM)
Yes - 16 (42.1%)
No - 14 (36.8%)
No comment - 1 (2.6%)
No, I would like to amend the amendment. - 7 (18.4%)
Total Voters: 36

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Ban Racial Slurs: AUP AMENDMENT December 2008  (Read 5063 times)
Ytts
Just can't shut me up
***

Pie Count: 21
Posts: 1401


View Profile
« on: December 04, 2008, 12:49:45 PM »

About two months ago the staff starting discussing some of their internal policies and writing them down.

One of the things that came out of doing that was that many wanted to outright ban all racial slurs as part of their policy. As this is an effective change to the rules, it was decided that this is something the community needs to vote on, as is the practice for any change to the AUP. (You'll recall the last time the AUP changed, a group of users had created a complete draft and the community then voted on the whole thing)


Quote
1. Users of the Keep are asked to keep profanity to a minimum.

Light swearing is acceptable, both in character and out of character. Light swearing includes words "ass," "damn," "hell," "bitch," and other swear words that aren't considered harsh swearing. Harsh swearing is acceptable out of character, when it is censored or not directed toward someone present in a hostile fashion. Harsher swearing is considered to be the words "fuck," "cunt," and the like. Room names and User names MAY NOT contain harsh profanity.

Racial slurs are not tolerated in usernames or in general speech, regardless of the intent with which they are used.


Amendment in italic for your easy reading.

Feel free to discuss the issue civilly; you can actually change your vote with this new software so it's possible to persuade others that you are right.

Logged

One thing I'll say for labour; & that is, that it isn't as offensive as the corresponding mutatory force which now threatens culture in America. I refer to the force of business as a dominating motive in life, & a persistent absorber of the strongest creative energies of the American people. -Lovecraft
Ytts
Just can't shut me up
***

Pie Count: 21
Posts: 1401


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2008, 12:52:14 PM »

I should indicate that previously, I would regard racial slurs as harsh swearing and so they'd be banned from usernames and room names normally and subject to the quasi quango of control there is for harsh swearing.
Logged

One thing I'll say for labour; & that is, that it isn't as offensive as the corresponding mutatory force which now threatens culture in America. I refer to the force of business as a dominating motive in life, & a persistent absorber of the strongest creative energies of the American people. -Lovecraft
Eos
Regular
*

Pie Count: 7
Posts: 115


Straight from the fridge, dad


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2008, 12:57:45 PM »

I think they should be restricted for superfluous and excessive use but allowed for appropriate discussion and possibly the very occasional joke.
Logged

Moondog
Terminal Case of Prolific Posteurism
***

Pie Count: 701
Posts: 4111


I dance between the raindrops


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2008, 01:00:23 PM »

Eh, ban the fuckin' things.
Logged

Keep eatin'. Go ahead.
Jurito
Lurker


Pie Count: 3
Posts: 20



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2008, 01:06:27 PM »

First it's racial slurs then we're back to not being able to curse period... I say they don't fit into the harsh swearing category and usually aren't directed towards someone in an derrogatory way, shouldn't be "banned".
Logged

Damn meddlin' kids.
Abel
Lurker


Pie Count: 9
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2008, 01:06:46 PM »

I think they should be restricted for superfluous and excessive use but allowed for appropriate discussion and possibly the very occasional joke.

I second this without the [very] in the occasional joke.
Logged
Pink
Guest
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2008, 01:07:53 PM »

I think that banning them is a very  cowardly way to deal with the problem. Throwing a sheet over the monster in the room doesn't make it go away.
Logged
Xachariah
Spam Smiter
Administrator
Terminal Case of Prolific Posteurism
*****

Pie Count: -131
Posts: 3605


Ombudsman


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2008, 01:13:18 PM »

I agree with Eos and Abel on the 'restricted from excessive use but allowed in the appropriate discussion and occasional joke.' I'd guess having them in usernames would be in 'excessive use.' If not, then 'allowed in the appropriate discussion and occasional joke, but don't put it in a username or use it too much (how much is too much is the moderator's discretion)' or something.
Logged

I'm an Ombudsman. I investigate; I only very rarely legislate (and only in a committee, no man is an island and all that).

Atheism
Regular
*

Pie Count: -2
Posts: 175


Chief Admin. of Haven


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2008, 01:14:01 PM »

No.

It stunts creativity. And the fact is that some characters are racist, though their players are not. It puts unneeded restrictions on creativity when there is actually no abundance of a problem anyway. I'm in an OOC room half the time, and never see blatant use of racial epithets.
Logged

Zengasm
Lurker


Pie Count: 9
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2008, 01:18:44 PM »

The fact you losers joke about racism is a pathetic way to be funny, easily. Makes me all weepy.
Logged
Jurito
Lurker


Pie Count: 3
Posts: 20



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2008, 01:20:21 PM »

Quote
Feel free to discuss the issue civilly; you can actually change your vote with this new software so it's possible to persuade others that you are right.

Good job at being civil there.
Logged

Damn meddlin' kids.
Atheism
Regular
*

Pie Count: -2
Posts: 175


Chief Admin. of Haven


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2008, 01:25:14 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbwNSNLPIfw

I think that is quite appropriate.
Logged

Atheism
Regular
*

Pie Count: -2
Posts: 175


Chief Admin. of Haven


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2008, 01:33:09 PM »

Also, as we were recently discussing in MH, what exactly is a "racial slur"? If someone gets angry enough, they can report to a mod that someone "used a racial epithet against them"...

The mods are going to be getting a lot of more work to do if they pass this amendment.
Logged

Pink
Guest
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2008, 01:41:17 PM »

Basement, Xach and Train make excellent points that I can't really disagree with.
Logged
Eos
Regular
*

Pie Count: 7
Posts: 115


Straight from the fridge, dad


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2008, 02:01:35 PM »

The fact you losers joke about racism is a pathetic way to be funny, easily. Makes me all weepy.

Logged

Furr
Regularly Verbose
**

Pie Count: -104
Posts: 367

User 21


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2008, 02:03:48 PM »

I think, the point with the swearing and anti-racist rules, is the point that they DO NOT HAPPEN OOC-ly. Fuck if your character is a racist asshole. It's your CHARACTER. Not you.

I say yes to this. As long as it apply to OOC talk.
The moment racism or swearing towards another user is happening, then the mods are free to deal with the problem. If it's an elf talking smack about those filthy, stinkin' dwarves.. Well, it's not out of character. It's part of the game.
But when JoeBob33 calls AxelTrix for filthy nigger in a whisper or to his digital face, then it's not okay anymore.

So.. I ramble.
Logged
Ytts
Just can't shut me up
***

Pie Count: 21
Posts: 1401


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2008, 02:15:00 PM »

Quote
I say yes to this. As long as it apply to OOC talk.

The way the amendment is worded, it applies to any usage, IC, OOC, etc.
Logged

One thing I'll say for labour; & that is, that it isn't as offensive as the corresponding mutatory force which now threatens culture in America. I refer to the force of business as a dominating motive in life, & a persistent absorber of the strongest creative energies of the American people. -Lovecraft
Jurito
Lurker


Pie Count: 3
Posts: 20



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2008, 02:48:21 PM »

If it counts IC then it REALLY is a 'fail' amendment. It restricts characters from being diverse and not the vapid "Happy all the time and loves everything" type.
Logged

Damn meddlin' kids.
Rosery
Psychotically Verbose
**

Pie Count: 13
Posts: 800


"The balance must be upheld!"


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2008, 03:10:17 PM »

I think it should be for OOC but not In character, it's a freeform site which means you should be free to create any character you want. I think this was brought up at some point but if you restrict character idea's you will kill freeform.
Logged
Joe
Newbie
*

Pie Count: -2
Posts: 95


Joeking, Joekitteh. Just a Joek.


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2008, 03:33:09 PM »

I'mma say that Moondoggy is completely right on that one.
Logged

On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.

"The brave are simply those with the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and notwithstanding go out to meet it." ~ Leopold, "Kate and Leopold"

I have no sword; I make No Mind my Sword.
Xachariah
Spam Smiter
Administrator
Terminal Case of Prolific Posteurism
*****

Pie Count: -131
Posts: 3605


Ombudsman


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2008, 03:36:29 PM »

Besides, even when cursing was banned, people used censorship. It's why Scribz still goes OSHT and shit like that.
Logged

I'm an Ombudsman. I investigate; I only very rarely legislate (and only in a committee, no man is an island and all that).

Zengasm
Lurker


Pie Count: 9
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2008, 04:09:55 PM »

Quote
Feel free to discuss the issue civilly; you can actually change your vote with this new software so it's possible to persuade others that you are right.

Good job at being civil there.



whiner
Logged
Inquisitor
Just can't shut me up
***

Pie Count: -430
Posts: 1390


Innocentia Nihil Probat


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2008, 10:14:04 PM »

I think they should be restricted for superfluous and excessive use but allowed for appropriate discussion and possibly the very occasional joke.

My "amend" vote is for this.
Logged
Soja
Psychotically Verbose
**

Pie Count: -57
Posts: 924


Author of Nightmares


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2008, 10:15:19 PM »

Great. Let's go through every possible loophole and amend things until the AUP is an even more impenetrable wall of text.

NO.

Jesus Christ.
Logged



H o n o R
"I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees."
Jurito
Lurker


Pie Count: 3
Posts: 20



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2008, 10:16:57 PM »

Quote
What a massive crock of bullshit. So your character can't call someone a nigger/spic/chink/gook/drunkmickbastard, whoopdifucking-doo.

Call 'em something more interesting, then. Like "You horse-fucking son of an African Honey Badger with Syphilis."

Complaining that "banning racial slurs limits my RP options" is pretty damn weak.

Example: There is a Nazi character on TK at the moment. This rule would prevent said character from being rped as the player originally intended which is as a jew-hating, Hitler-worshipping, undead nazi. Who are YOU to say that character isn't viable?
Logged

Damn meddlin' kids.
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!