1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: January 13, 2011, 11:53:14 AM » |
|
Edit: Syn weighed in.
Edit edit: Our abstainer ceased abstaining.
Of the 5 moderators who spoke on the topic (not including myself), we've got 4 people saying 'the ban stays', and 1 for 'sure why not'. "19:01:34 [Moondog whispers to Username Withheld] Hm. I tell you what, I've already made my mind up, perhaps somewhat unreasonably, so I'm going to remove my decision from the running. Therefore, I'm going to leave the ban in place (for now), and bring it up with the rest of the moderation staff. If one of them agrees that permanent banishment is too harsh, I'll relent and knock it down to thirty days." When you say, "Sure why not", is that saying that yes, take the ban down to 30 days?
In any case, I don't believe that his actions warranted such a harsh punishment. He's already been banned for over a week. Un-ban him, imo.I think that "sure why not" is a "sure why not keep him banned" (which I'm not particularly fond of the colloquial way that decision was stated. It may not be important to some. But it's important to me.) and while I can agree with you here, I really wouldn't mind a 30 day ban. Maybe even longer. I don't agree with the fact that I was banned at all, but again, that's up to the mods to decide if I'm in the wrong. If the ban gets turned over I'll do my best in the future to be more discreet with how I talk to people, or just not talk at all. But like I said, even a 30 day ban is a gross overkill for the actual "transgression" , but I am responsible for my history as a griefer, so I would understand it. I just don't want it to be permanent. Despite my history I'm a good role player and I've made a serious effort to be a driving role in the RP community. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 11:56:48 AM by 1337 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Moondog
Terminal Case of Prolific Posteurism
Pie Count: 700
Posts: 4111
I dance between the raindrops
|
|
« Reply #76 on: January 13, 2011, 12:05:53 PM » |
|
Edit: Syn weighed in.
Edit edit: Our abstainer ceased abstaining.
Of the 5 moderators who spoke on the topic (not including myself), we've got 4 people saying 'the ban stays', and 1 for 'sure why not'. "19:01:34 [Moondog whispers to Username Withheld] Hm. I tell you what, I've already made my mind up, perhaps somewhat unreasonably, so I'm going to remove my decision from the running. Therefore, I'm going to leave the ban in place (for now), and bring it up with the rest of the moderation staff. If one of them agrees that permanent banishment is too harsh, I'll relent and knock it down to thirty days." When you say, "Sure why not", is that saying that yes, take the ban down to 30 days?
In any case, I don't believe that his actions warranted such a harsh punishment. He's already been banned for over a week. Un-ban him, imo.I think that "sure why not" is a "sure why not keep him banned" (which I'm not particularly fond of the colloquial way that decision was stated. It may not be important to some. But it's important to me.) and while I can agree with you here, I really wouldn't mind a 30 day ban. Maybe even longer. I don't agree with the fact that I was banned at all, but again, that's up to the mods to decide if I'm in the wrong. If the ban gets turned over I'll do my best in the future to be more discreet with how I talk to people, or just not talk at all. But like I said, even a 30 day ban is a gross overkill for the actual "transgression" , but I am responsible for my history as a griefer, so I would understand it. I just don't want it to be permanent. Despite my history I'm a good role player and I've made a serious effort to be a driving role in the RP community. It was 'sure, why not let him back under a few qualifiers'. Also I'm colliquializing said person's statement, because going word for word for word is boring. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keep eatin'. Go ahead.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #77 on: January 13, 2011, 12:13:23 PM » |
|
Edit: Syn weighed in.
Edit edit: Our abstainer ceased abstaining.
Of the 5 moderators who spoke on the topic (not including myself), we've got 4 people saying 'the ban stays', and 1 for 'sure why not'. "19:01:34 [Moondog whispers to Username Withheld] Hm. I tell you what, I've already made my mind up, perhaps somewhat unreasonably, so I'm going to remove my decision from the running. Therefore, I'm going to leave the ban in place (for now), and bring it up with the rest of the moderation staff. If one of them agrees that permanent banishment is too harsh, I'll relent and knock it down to thirty days." When you say, "Sure why not", is that saying that yes, take the ban down to 30 days?
In any case, I don't believe that his actions warranted such a harsh punishment. He's already been banned for over a week. Un-ban him, imo.I think that "sure why not" is a "sure why not keep him banned" (which I'm not particularly fond of the colloquial way that decision was stated. It may not be important to some. But it's important to me.) and while I can agree with you here, I really wouldn't mind a 30 day ban. Maybe even longer. I don't agree with the fact that I was banned at all, but again, that's up to the mods to decide if I'm in the wrong. If the ban gets turned over I'll do my best in the future to be more discreet with how I talk to people, or just not talk at all. But like I said, even a 30 day ban is a gross overkill for the actual "transgression" , but I am responsible for my history as a griefer, so I would understand it. I just don't want it to be permanent. Despite my history I'm a good role player and I've made a serious effort to be a driving role in the RP community. It was 'sure, why not let him back under a few qualifiers'. Also I'm colliquializing said person's statement, because going word for word for word is boring. Oh! My mistake. My apologies for misunderstanding. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Moondog
Terminal Case of Prolific Posteurism
Pie Count: 700
Posts: 4111
I dance between the raindrops
|
|
« Reply #78 on: January 13, 2011, 12:14:10 PM » |
|
Edit: Syn weighed in.
Edit edit: Our abstainer ceased abstaining.
Of the 5 moderators who spoke on the topic (not including myself), we've got 4 people saying 'the ban stays', and 1 for 'sure why not'. "19:01:34 [Moondog whispers to Username Withheld] Hm. I tell you what, I've already made my mind up, perhaps somewhat unreasonably, so I'm going to remove my decision from the running. Therefore, I'm going to leave the ban in place (for now), and bring it up with the rest of the moderation staff. If one of them agrees that permanent banishment is too harsh, I'll relent and knock it down to thirty days." When you say, "Sure why not", is that saying that yes, take the ban down to 30 days?
In any case, I don't believe that his actions warranted such a harsh punishment. He's already been banned for over a week. Un-ban him, imo.I think that "sure why not" is a "sure why not keep him banned" (which I'm not particularly fond of the colloquial way that decision was stated. It may not be important to some. But it's important to me.) and while I can agree with you here, I really wouldn't mind a 30 day ban. Maybe even longer. I don't agree with the fact that I was banned at all, but again, that's up to the mods to decide if I'm in the wrong. If the ban gets turned over I'll do my best in the future to be more discreet with how I talk to people, or just not talk at all. But like I said, even a 30 day ban is a gross overkill for the actual "transgression" , but I am responsible for my history as a griefer, so I would understand it. I just don't want it to be permanent. Despite my history I'm a good role player and I've made a serious effort to be a driving role in the RP community. It was 'sure, why not let him back under a few qualifiers'. Also I'm colliquializing said person's statement, because going word for word for word is boring. Oh! My mistake. My apologies for misunderstanding. S'all good. My fault for not being explicit about it in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keep eatin'. Go ahead.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #79 on: January 13, 2011, 12:16:24 PM » |
|
S'all good. My fault for not being explicit about it in the first place.
I gave you a delicious pie.... I may or may not have taken a bite out of it. >.>'' |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
-=Styles=-
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -149
Posts: 587
-=Stabs=-
|
|
« Reply #80 on: January 13, 2011, 01:53:23 PM » |
|
Maybe I'll give you the answer when you broaden your mind.
Right. You don't know how to answer so you want to attack me on some level that has....zero capability of being remotely funny or witty in any way, whatsoever; oddly enough this reflects your entire nature as a person in general. Somehow I'm reminded of being forced to watch re-runs of tv shows I never liked when I was younger. You're desperate for attention. That's all you had to say. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nonsensical, brash-nasty humor. With lots and lots of swear words.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #81 on: January 13, 2011, 02:10:13 PM » |
|
Maybe I'll give you the answer when you broaden your mind.
Right. You don't know how to answer so you want to attack me on some level that has....zero capability of being remotely funny or witty in any way, whatsoever; oddly enough this reflects your entire nature as a person in general. Somehow I'm reminded of being forced to watch re-runs of tv shows I never liked when I was younger. You're desperate for attention. That's all you had to say. Keep the ****posting in Micha3l's thread please. Lolz he likes the attention. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 02:39:58 PM by 1337 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
-=Styles=-
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -149
Posts: 587
-=Stabs=-
|
|
« Reply #82 on: January 13, 2011, 04:19:25 PM » |
|
GOD DAMNIT 1337 DON'T MAKE ME WHIP YOUR ASS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nonsensical, brash-nasty humor. With lots and lots of swear words.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #83 on: January 13, 2011, 04:58:00 PM » |
|
GOD DAMNIT 1337 DON'T MAKE ME WHIP YOUR ASS!
How'd you know I was into that kinda' stuff!? >.> |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shadowborn1321
Lurker
Pie Count: 0
Posts: 17
|
|
« Reply #84 on: January 13, 2011, 06:50:55 PM » |
|
GOD DAMNIT 1337 DON'T MAKE ME WHIP YOUR ASS!
How'd you know I was into that kinda' stuff!? >.> (He totally is) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
-=Styles=-
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -149
Posts: 587
-=Stabs=-
|
|
« Reply #85 on: January 13, 2011, 06:58:46 PM » |
|
There's not a whole lot that I'm not into that someone won't discover they're into as well once they've tried it out  That said, go get me some cookies, bitch. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nonsensical, brash-nasty humor. With lots and lots of swear words.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #86 on: January 17, 2011, 10:29:37 AM » |
|
Now I'm hungry.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
-=Styles=-
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -149
Posts: 587
-=Stabs=-
|
|
« Reply #87 on: January 18, 2011, 05:11:59 AM » |
|
Dude, 1337...
Your sig cracks me up everytime I look at it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nonsensical, brash-nasty humor. With lots and lots of swear words.
|
|
|
1337
Psychotically Verbose
Pie Count: -33
Posts: 919
Now that I found it I don't know what to write....
|
|
« Reply #88 on: January 18, 2011, 07:56:19 AM » |
|
Dude, 1337...
Your sig cracks me up everytime I look at it.
I'm glad. I like bringing smiles to all of your faces. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
